The strengths of Muslim American couples in the face of religious discrimination following September 11 and the Iraq war. Employment Relations Today, 34, 77–84.īuonanno v. Reversing claims of reverse religious discrimination. Equal Opportunities International, 19, 70–74.īrody, H. New developments concerning religious discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.īrecheen, M., & Kleiner, B. Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1, 33–48.īowling, N. and the Religious Organization Exemption of Title VII. Goldilocks and the three-judge panel: Spencer v. Ethical and regulatory issues, 14, 1–5.īoulter, B. Allied academies international conference: Proceedings of the academy of legal. The perils of religious accommodation: Employees’ perceptions. Law and Human Behavior, 22(1), 33–57.īorstorff, P., & Arlington, K. The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(1), 23–30.īlumenthal, J. Effects of manifest ethnic identification on employment discrimination. Predictors of workplace accommodations for employees with mobility-related disabilities. Public Personnel Management, 32, 315–330.īalser, D.
Diversity in religious practice: Implications of Islamic values in the public workplace.
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Islam: Enduring myths and changing realities, 588, 40–51.īall, C., & Haque, A. So that you may know one another: A Muslim American reflects on pluralism and Islam. Religious accommodation in the workplace: Your rights and accommodations. Hopkins’ Nonprofit Counsel, 29, 1.Īnderson v. Supreme Court fashions ministerial exception to employment discrimination laws. Vienna: European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.Īmerican Religious Identification Survey. Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU after 11 September 2001. In addition to highlighting trends that contribute to religious discrimination in the workplace, this literature review addresses where there are gaps in the existing research that call for further research and offers practical implications for employers and organizations.Īllen, C., & Nielsen, J. The trends identified in our review paper highlight the need for employers to understand and address religious discrimination issues in the workplace and the lack of empirical research in this area points to a critical gap in our understanding of workplace religious discrimination that warrants future research. Findingsīuilding from the literature review and case law, we highlight four trends that contribute to religious discrimination in the workplace: (1) legal ambiguities, (2) increased religious diversity in the American workforce, (3) increasing expression of religious beliefs, and (4) the unique nature of religion. We conduct a systematic literature review of the psychology and business research on religious discrimination. In doing so, this review also highlights what future research is needed, and what the challenges and practical implications of religious discrimination are for managers. The goal of this review paper is to summarize the psychological and HR practitioner-focused research on religious discrimination as it relates to the CRA to understand these religious discrimination claims. Over the last decade, religious discrimination claims have risen more rapidly compared to most other protected categories under the Civil Rights Act (CRA).
0 kommentar(er)
